I'm assuming that most people posting here don't consider themselves to be a part of any particular political party or movement, such as "libertarianism, or Democrat" ect.. At least for me, I do not consider myself to be aligned with any particular group, I look at all them all and form my opinion based on looking at as broad of a spectrum of views as possible.. However, I do agree with many of the views of "Libertarianism", and I will explain why I feel that views held by those who identify themselves with that group are often unfairly distorted..
--
my views on Ron Paul
To start off, I think Ron Paul may be a little too "purist" with his views, which could create a glass ceiling for him after he reaches a certain threshold of support.. In particular I think this is the case with having such views as being pro-life, anti-North American Union ( which is painted as "racist" due to lack of public understanding of the issue, as I will explain below ) and not supporting the idea of co2 being the major cause of global warming ( which I will explain my views of below also. ) Ron Paul's asset is his complete proven integrity and willingness to speak up about the most significant and genuine causes of corruption in politics, which no other candidate will dare touch.
--
my views on the North American Union
The upcoming "North American Union" is a very big issue which is being hidden from the public through deception by the media.. The plan under the North American Union is to remove the borders between the United States, Canada and Mexico, turn them into one large country, and to remove the laws and constitution of the United States and replace it with a new constitution for the newly consolidated country which will be written by the proven corrupt neo-cons who are currently running affairs.
This plan is currently being implemented by superhighways being built by international companies linking the three countries together, as well as allowing immigrants to come to the United States to live with undocumented status and no rights as citizens. The immigrants being undocumented creates problems for society and themselves, for example in some cases they are issued drivers licenses and drive without liability insurance, and in some areas the police are instructed to let them go without any written record or citation if they are pulled over for a traffic violation, ect.. The Immigration debate is sensitive because it opens itself to charges of racism wether racism is involved in the discussion or not.. This factor is exploited by the neo-cons who charge "racism" every time to subject of NOA is brought up, enabling them to go forward with their plans for corrupt consolidation and replacing of the Constitution.
I am well informed on the issue of the NOA, and my views on how to fix the problem are very firm due to my familiarity with the issue.. People's opinions vary on how to deal with the issue of undocumented immigration, but I firmly believe that those who are currently in the country should be given a specific path to citizenship and the full rights associated with it. This will remove the many current social problems caused by and for millions of people living in the country without legal status. I also believe that the plan of the North American Union should be exposed and the borders sealed up once the current individuals in the country are given legal status, and after a certain date measures blocking illegal immigration should be enforced.
I find that the topic of the North American Union is one of the least understood issues and also the one with the most profound implications. I will soon be creating an extremely comprehensive and detailed summary article about the subject on the new website GetUpToSpeedFast.com.
--
my views on the issue of global warming
About the issue of Global Warming, I have not had a chance to fully immerse myself in the subject enough to have formed a firm opinion about it yet. The debate seems to be whether co2 is the major cause of the warming or not. I do know that people who don't feel that co2 is the major contributor feel that other environmental factors are the major cause and also feel that the earth cools and warms up on a regular basis due to these other factors, including a factor of the sun's intensity varying over long periods of time, and other factors such as volcanic activity, ect.. Some also feel that chemtrails are associated with this issue, and there is a sub-debate over if the chemtrails are intended to accelerate the warming or hinder it.
Also, many people who don't believe that co2 is a major contributor to the warming feel that the topic of global warming is used as a distraction technique in used in order to waste the time and resources of activists, and give people a false sense of satisfaction that they are making a difference.
In any event, I am going to immerse myself in the subject and carefully look at all views of the subject without bias and find what I will consider to be the most accurate view of the subject, based on comparing all of the information coming from all of the viewpoints. I will then create a summary article about the subject on the website News of Interest.TV..
--
I thank Truthmove for letting me view my views here, I feel that communication and debate of contrasting views are the path to the most accurate truths and enlightenment.. Peace everyone..
