(just posted at DU 9-11 Forum)
Re-Framing the Debate(s) Around the 9/11 Cover-Up http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboa...
Re-Framing the Debate(s) Around the 9/11 Cover-Up
He Who Defines, Wins
It's rather like the strategic energy at play in a sports game. Frame it so citizens are on the defense and it weakens the offensive.
Fortunately, re-framing/re-claiming the debate is a fairly simple thing to do.
http://www.conceptualguerilla.com/?q=node/257 1. Winning means winning the uncommitted center 2. Moderate or marginalize your opponent 3. Choose your battles wisely, so as to argue on your turf and not his 4. When forced to argue on his turf, re frame the debate in terms favorable to you (and post ADDITIONAL information or resources for other readers to follow up with-jh)
Re-framing the Debate http://ctb.ku.edu/en/tablecontents/sub_section_mai...
For an example of practice techniques to reclaim the 9-11 debate, see my replies in this thread: 9/11 Truth Movement: Looking for Truth, or Promoting Theories by Any Means Necessary? http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboa...
BRADY: Progressives must redefine debate - (see related caution below re: 9/11 moveme (much more, plus superb resources by dbonds at link!)