Forum

TruthMove Forum

TruthMove Forum » TruthMove Main Forum

Gary Hart warns Iran to beware Cheney false-flag provocation for U.S. attack (8 posts)

  1. NicholasLevis
    Member

    Sept. 28. The following brief open letter is from Gary Hart, the former Democratic senator from Colorado and winner of presidential primaries in 1984, also the co-author of the much-cited 2000 Hart-Rudman report on terrorism, writing in the Huffington Post yesterday in the form of

    "Unsolicited Advice to the Government of Iran"

    Presuming that you are not actually ignorant enough to desire war with the United States, you might be well advised to read the history of the sinking of the U.S.S. Maine in Havana harbor in 1898 and the history of the Gulf of Tonkin in 1964.

    Having done so, you will surely recognize that Americans are reluctant to go to war unless attacked. Until Pearl Harbor, we were even reluctant to get involved in World War II. For historians of American wars the question is whether we provoke provocations.

    Given the unilateral U.S. invasion of Iraq in 2003, you are obviously thinking the rules have changed. Provocation is no longer required to take America to war. But even in this instance, we were led to believe that the mass murderer of American civilians, Osama bin Laden, was lurking, literally or figuratively, in the vicinity of Baghdad.

    Given all this, you would probably be well advised to keep your forces, including clandestine forces, as far away from the Iraqi border as you can. You might even consider bringing in some neighbors to verify that you are not shipping arms next door. Tone down the rhetoric on Zionism. You've established your credentials with those in your world who thrive on that.

    If it makes you feel powerful to hurl accusations at the American eagle, have at it. Sticks and stones, etc. But, for the next sixteen months or so, you should not only not take provocative actions, you should not seem to be doing so.

    For the vast majority of Americans who seek no wider war, in the Middle East or elsewhere, don't tempt fate. Don't give a certain vice president we know the justification he is seeking to attack your country. That is unless you happen to like having bombs fall on your head.

    Original at http://www.huffingtonpost.com/gary-hart/unsolicite...

    Gary Hart is now on the Council of Foreign Relations and likely to be privy to deliberations among the nation's highest foreign policy makers. He has thus delivered in clear, plain language his opinion that the vice-president of the United States, Richard Cheney, is liable to arrange a false-flag cause for war against Iran, following the model of the USS Maine explosion in 1898, falsely blamed on the Spanish to start the Spanish-American War, and the so-called Gulf of Tonkin incident - the fictional event used in 1964 to railroad the Congress into a resolution empowering the war in Vietnam.

    Is there a bigger news story out there? Down the rabbit hole we go.

    Posted 17 years ago #
  2. Victronix
    Member

    Nice.

    At least Ahmadinejad gets it about inside jobs already. And he has to do the opposite of what Saddam did. As long as he has nukes he has a slim hope of protecting himself.

    Posted 17 years ago #
  3. NicholasLevis
    Member

    Now, to another matter: How can Hart not be thinking that 9/11 is an inside job?

    Posted 17 years ago #
  4. JohnA
    Member

    i very much believe that many many people within government and the media understand that 911 may have been allowed to happen - on purpose - or worse. the sentiment of the american public is a measuring stick of what may be going on in the hearts and minds of our elected officials. you hear many suggestive comments indicative of this sentiment coming from politicians and media figures who allude to this in cryptic and suggestive ways.

    unfortunately we have note yet found a champion for our cause among those who suspect - or have evidence.

    Posted 17 years ago #
  5. JonGold
    Member

    Did you guys see this?

    http://rawstory.com//news/2007/Cheney_seeks_pretex...

    "The news came on the heels of another Sunday report in Newsweek, which confirmed a quotation from a Cheney advisor who said that the Vice President “had been mulling the idea of pushing for limited Israeli missile strikes against the Iranian nuclear site at Natanz - and perhaps other sites - in order to provoke Tehran into lashing out.”

    Such a strike would then give the US the ability to launch a strike in response."

    Posted 17 years ago #
  6. JonGold
    Member

    "Now, to another matter: How can Hart not be thinking that 9/11 is an inside job?"

    May 16, 2002: Cheney Warns Democrats Against Criticizing Handling of Pre-9/11 Warnings

    In the wake of new information on what President Bush knew, Vice President Cheney states, “[M]y Democratic friends in Congress… need to be very cautious not to seek political advantage by making incendiary suggestions, as were made by some today, that the White House had advance information that would have prevented the tragic attacks of 9/11.” He calls such criticism “thoroughly irresponsible… in time of war” and states that any serious probe of 9/11 foreknowledge would be tantamount to giving “aid and comfort” to the enemy. [Washington Post, 5/17/2002]

    Think Cheney threatened him?

    Posted 17 years ago #
  7. JonGold
    Member

    BTW Nick... I'm surprised that you like the phrase, "inside job." I've always found it to be limiting. Although, I think I did see you say your "definition" for what "inside job" means to you in another thread.

    I've changed my "catch phrase" so many times... it was "9/11 was an inside job" to "Elements of our Government were complicit in the attacks" to what I use now which is essentially that the Bush Administration and others have earned the title of suspect for the crimes of 9/11. From their actions before, during, and after the attacks. I did that because, in America, you are innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.

    Posted 17 years ago #
  8. JonGold
    Member

    It's funny though, I have no problem saying that they purposefully lied us into war. Is it because that's more widely known/accepted?

    Posted 17 years ago #

Reply

You must log in to post.