TruthMove Forum

Register or log in:

Username:

Password:

TruthMove Forum » TruthMove Main Forum

Tarpley denounces LaRouche! (5 posts)

1. DBLS
   Inactive

   This is good to see;

   Instead, Berlet suggests that I am a sock-puppet for LaRouche. LaRouche drove me out of his organization in 1997, more than ten years ago. I have nothing in common with LaRouche, whose supporters have repeatedly slandered me, albeit in terms slightly different from those used by Berlet. LaRouche is a border guard for the sinister Hillary Clinton-Rahm Emanuel neocon warmonger machine in the Democratic Party. He is currently trying to combine that with the notion that Bush is a force for peace with Putin's Russia ­ a manifest absurdity, since Bush is promoting aggression against Russia in the form of a nuclear first-strike capability. Contrary to what Berlet writes, LaRouche has no commitment to 9/11 truth and has contributed nothing to the 9/11 truth movement. LaRouche has rather sponsored a personality cult complete with a youth movement which is a parody of Chairman Mao's Red Guards of the mid-1960s.

   http://www.rense.com/general78/kenn.htm

   Posted 17 years ago #
2. JonGold
   Member

   I don't put much stock in what Webster Tarpley says. I listened to his last show. It was full of lies.

   Posted 17 years ago #
3. truthmover
   Administrator

   Dem,

   Most of us generally aren't that into what's being presented over at Rense.com, but this article, and the response by Leleand Lehrman are really quite informative regarding the continued promotion of the KW. I think this might have better gone in that thread.

   Leland runs Mothermedia where there is currently a telling article about him:

   The New World Order and What to Do About It - Bioregional Sovereignty and Currency Deregulation http://www.mothermedia.org/

   And he contributed the following article to 911physics.net:

   Israel, Mossad, Iran and a Nuclear False Flag Attack http://physics911.net/nuclearfalseflag.htm

   Dem, I am not at all relieved that Tarpley says things that are reasonable from time to time. As far as I'm concerned, he is as much of a problem as LaRouche. Neither deserve any great deal of our attention except to the extent to which they attempt to undermine our efforts.

   Jon Gold's comment pretty much summed that up well.

   Posted 17 years ago #
4. Arabesque
   Member

   In that article, he says again that Cindy Sheehan removed her signature due to fear of losing her funding. It is an outrageous statement. How many times did she appear on Alex Jones' radio show? How many times has she retracted her statements about her 9/11 questions?

   If he can lie about this, he can lie about anything.

   While Mr. Tarpley may denounce his ties to LaRouche, it doesn't answer the curious fact that four (including Tarpley) of the most divisive supporters of the KW (those engaging in vitriolic statements) have ties to LaRouche. I don't know why or what this means, but it is suspicious to say the least.

   Posted 17 years ago #
5. NicholasLevis
   Member

   Honestly: who cares?

   Posted 17 years ago #

Reply

You must log in to post.