WTC 7 in Calgary Herald
As posted on 9/11 blogger:
http://www.canada.com/calgaryherald/news/story.htm...
Out of curiosity, does anyone know of whether debunkers have explained why the fire & gravity driven collapses of WTC 1&2 and WTC 7 differed so significantly? Though I am not going to suggest that very different structural buildings should collapse in exactly the same or even very similar ways, it seems to me there is some explaining to do if WTC 1, 2, and 7 all collapsed from fire & gravity yet the first two mushroomed outwards / fragmented during the process of the collapse while the latter remained intact in a "curtain" free-fall...
On the flipside, how do proponents of the controlled demolition view account for the difference? I believe most of what I have read about this suggests that 1&2 were, if CD, a very unconventional CD, while 7 appears to be a sort of "textbook" example.