I realize you have good intentions. Much of the case you are describing has already been out there for years. Indeed, the Democrats would love to have you work towards incompetence -- this would be their dream. I wouldn't be surprised if they go as far as creating the incompetence case themselves.
But is this really the right thing to do? Is this our goal for this whole movement?
It's important to notice that even the FAMILIES themselves were braver than this, and would not embrace incompetence by ignoring obvious questions which pointed beyond incompetence. The people who were charged with putting together the questions to put before the Commission were at least courageous and convinced and concerned enough to bring up Building 7 in the carefully chosen questions they put forth -
"13. On 9/11, no aircraft hit WTC 7. Why did the building fall at 5:20 PM that evening?"
http://www.911independentcommission.org/giuliani31...
Should we edit out such questions, even though the people who originally created the commission were even willing to put this out there?
To say that we should now go for "incompetence" is basically to say that we will trade the real truth -- that false flags are what governments and insiders do, that they will indeed kill their own people, kill their own presidents, etc. -- for a legal case against a couple of sacrificial lambs, like Libby, but which in the short run can rocket to fame a Democrat? Certainly rocketing a Democrat to fame isn't your goal, but it's theirs. Their goal will be to do the handoff (D-R-D-R) but become famous while taking down a few minions over 9/11 but at the same time, never revealing the real situation which is the information they don't want the public to ever embrace and which would cost them their jobs if they did - that false flags are real.
But why would we step back from EVEN what the families themselves were willing to go public with? This only makes sense when you are creating an articial case which will likely split the movement and drain inspiration.
There is very strong evidence which is not incompetence. But part of that evidence is physical. The Pentagon no-plane issue is obviously not strong evidence and is only used to discredit us. We know this. This hoax is paired with the demolitions as a strategy to discredit them both as the looney "physical evidence" and make them untouchable. But Building 7 is very strong evidence, one of our absolute strongest points and extremely inspiring to people. It is unique because it shows that insiders were not incompetent, but were active in the cover-up. The put options. Mineta's testimony. Etc. The families knew this. They understood that it wasn't just incompetence.
If Americans don't learn that this was beyond incompetence, we are laying the whole country open in a vulnerable stance to accept and digest the NEXT false flag as incompetence, instead of what it really is. And by then, everything will be worse. There is a long history of false flags and they aren't going away because Obama or Hillary gets in.
9/11 cannot be seen as Katrina or we all lose.
The situation that you need to understand is that while the Democrats aren't the bull-in-the-china-shop that Bush is, they are essential for creating the environment for Bush to exist, for covering for him, for selling us all out to the corporations at every turn so that our media is 100% a tool of manipulation and not news, for pretending that we have a democracy when we do not, etc.
An important quote -
"For over 130 years the two major parties have been extremely effective in preventing the emergence of any mass political formations that could challenge their political monopoly. Most attempts to build political alternatives have been efforts to represent the interests of the average person, the working people. These efforts have been unable to develop. Both major parties have been dominated by moneyed interests and today reflect the historic period of corporate rule.
In this sense United States history has been different from that of any other advanced industrial nation. In all other countries multi-party systems have appeared and to one degree or another these countries have more democratic electoral laws and better political representation. In most other countries, there exist political parties ostensibly based on or promoting the interest of non-corporate sectors such as working people."
http://www.mvp-seattle.com/Pages/ExtraPages/pageAv...
Again, I realize your intentions are good. The low hanging fruit of what the Dems will offer us will be almost impossible to reject, and yet, this will be the most likely thing they will do. We can bury the truth and swallow incompetence, but we all lose with that.
An investigation via the Democrats will be a huge battle, so thanks for reminding me and encouraging this debate, which needs to happen sooner, rather than later.
Obama's quote -
"While I do not believe the U.S. government was complicit in the attacks, I do think it should be held accountable for the unacceptable mistakes it made in the run-up to that terrible day."
http://www.jonesreport.com/articles/230207_obama_9...
It was all just a big mistake . . .