Forum

TruthMove Forum

TruthMove Forum » TruthMove Main Forum

Lawyers’ Committee for 911 Inquiry (2 posts)

  1. BrianG
    Member

    The Lawyers participated in the Request for Correction to the NIST twin towers report that was recently submitted to NIST.

    The architects and engineers for truth have been running a three-day virtual conference. Yesterday the last hour was given over to the Lawyers and to Barbara Honegger and it was all about the Anthrax conspiracy theory. Regardless of the merits of the Anthrax issue, I am very leery of the proposition that you prove a conspiracy theory by asserting an unrelated conspiracy theory.

    Posted 4 years ago #
  2. mark
    Member

    It's hard to prove "conspiracy" by promoting hoaxes, even if they are popular in a small group. It's not "truth" to claim the firefighters were lying when they watched the towers buckle before they fell down. It's fortunate the towers stayed standing long enough for most of the occupants to escape.

    Fire has toppled skyscrapers, it's not common but not unprecedented.

    The Boeing 747 that hit an apartment building in Amsterdam in 1992 (?) - an accident - caused part of that building to collapse immediately upon impact. It was a cargo plane, not full of passengers, so the casualties were almost entirely on the ground (except for the pilots). Probably not much consolation for the people on the ground but at least it wasn't deliberate.

    Meanwhile, how many demolition promoters know about Able Danger, Alec Station, the NRO plane into building exercise during the attacks, or anything else that would put the official story promoters on the defensive? In my experience, almost none.

    Asking someone promoting the "no plane Pentagon" hoax for input about any of this is either deliberate distraction or utter incompetence, but either way, it's ridiculous.

    Posted 4 years ago #

Reply

You must log in to post.