I'm open to counterarguments, but I do not support this, on first-amendment grounds.
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/08/07/business/media/...
In a recent court filing, four law professors who specialize in free-speech issues said that Mr. Jones’s oeuvre was riddled with “absurd conspiracy theories†and urged a federal judge considering a lawsuit against him not to let him hide behind the First Amendment while publishing his rhetoric.
“False speech does not serve the public interest the way that true speech does,†the scholars wrote. “And indeed, there is no constitutional value in false statements of fact.â€