please don't waste your time on this
from a "9/11 scholar" who is aligned with all the wrong people, Andrew Johnson.
http://www.checktheevidence.com/911/TheNew9-11Hija...
From an observer’s stand point, it seemed to me that people like Rosalee Grable, Nico Haupt, Gerard Holmgren, Morgan and Judy seemed to have unveiled an “additional layer†of the 9/11 Cover Up. Also, it seemed that tactics of ridicule and “trashing†were being used against this group of people in a disturbingly similar pattern to those used, for example, by people in the “mainstream†who won’t accept that 9/11 was an Inside Job. One example of this happened more recently, when Prof Reynolds was “booted†from SPINE because the rest of the group did not seem to like him discussing the evidence that something other than planes hit the WTC buildings.
In message board discussions, whenever the evidence that something other than Big Boeings might have hit the WTC, or that some type of unconventional technology may have also been used in the destruction of the towers, “trolls†invariably appear – usually anonymous and often very promptly. One can imagine that, if this evidence is important and does indeed indicate advanced technologies were used in the perpetration of the “9/11 illusionâ€, elements of the Military Industrial Complex would both have the means and the motive for covering this up. This can be done both by “paid agents†and unwittingly by those people who are unwilling to examine the evidence that people like Steve Jones are not necessarily working to expose all aspects of the cover up. If people have, after the shock of 9/11, “placed their faith†in someone like Steve Jones, there is perhaps an understandable reluctance to “step back againâ€, examine the evidence and see if the same old games are still being played