Forum

TruthMove Forum

TruthMove Forum » TruthMove Main Forum

Chossudovsky accuses Nafeez Ahmed of plagiarism (6 posts)

  1. christs4sale
    Administrator

    It begins at about 42:00 in the broadcast:

    http://media18.podbean.com/pb/88611952fce12445fb58...

    Does anyone know anything more about this?

    Posted 12 years ago #
  2. mark
    Member

    Sorry I didn't listen to the podcast, but Ahmed writes about Peak Oil in his writings and Chossudovky's website has published Peak Oil Denial articles.

    Posted 12 years ago #
  3. truthmod
    Administrator

    The link isn't working anymore...

    Posted 12 years ago #
  4. christs4sale
    Administrator

    Try this:

    http://lifeboathour.podbean.com/mf/web/sh59nm/Life...

    I have always noticed the large amount of junk on Chossudovsky's website. On the other hand, I think that he would be a pretty good candidate to impersonate Werner Herzog.

    Also, at 35:00, a caller asks Chossudovsky about Peak Oil.

    Posted 12 years ago #
  5. NicholasLevis
    Member

    Can you give us the gist?

    What does he say Nafeez took? I know that Nafeez's work is very carefully sourced. In the 9/11 works, in his use of secondary material he constantly provides citations and mentions authors and sources on a page by page basis. He makes no claims to journalism and does little archival research (more than, ahem, Michel) and makes it clear throughout that his work is synthetic.

    I respect Michel's work, but he has a tendency to fly off the ego-handle that I have also witnessed in person.

    Posted 12 years ago #
  6. christs4sale
    Administrator

    Ruppert goes through who he thought the original top people were in 9/11 research were and one of the individuals he names Nafeez Ahmed. Chossudovsky then says that Nafeez plagiarized both Ruppert's and Chossudovsky's work. He then says that Nafeez admitted in a letter that he plagiarized Chossudovsky's work. It is completely unspecific and it is quick because Ruppert changes the topic and says that Chossudovsky said the accusation distancing himself from it.

    I know that Nafeez's work is very carefully sourced. In the 9/11 works, in his use of secondary material he constantly provides citations and mentions authors and sources on a page by page basis. He makes no claims to journalism and does little archival research (more than, ahem, Michel) and makes it clear throughout that his work is synthetic.

    This I completely agree with.

    Posted 12 years ago #

Reply

You must log in to post.