Forum

TruthMove Forum

TruthMove Forum » TruthMove Main Forum

Disconnecting the Dots?? (3 posts)

  1. christs4sale
    Administrator

    Does anyone know what is happening with this book?

    http://www.amazon.com/Disconnecting-Dots-How-Allow...

    Posted 13 years ago #
  2. truthmod
    Administrator

    No idea about that book.

    What about DRG's latest? Just noticed this when I followed the link. http://www.amazon.com/Cognitive-Infiltration-Appoi...

    From a review:

    In his new book COGNITIVE INFILTRATION David Ray Griffin has provided the first truly adequate response to Sunstein's deeply-flawed and legally-questionable arguments. Griffin penetrates the obfuscation and phony scholarship employed by Sunstein to create the illusion of a rational critique of the 9/11 truth movement's alternative account of the events of September 11, 2001. Griffin presents a series of ten theses put forward by Sunstein, and shows that each is fundamentally flawed. Further, he demonstrates that Sunstein is unable to avoid numerous self-contradictions, either explicit or implied, that together amount to an internal, hidden counter-argument to his own position, which Griffin, in a novel and entertaining approach, brings out as an ironic "esoteric" meaning of Sunstein's essay.

    So, DRG does not actually talk about REAL infiltration in the book at all?

    Posted 13 years ago #
  3. mark
    Member

    Sunstein's essay mentions that some truth movement activists state the "no plane hit Pentagon" meme was disinformation to muddy the waters, but of course he doesn't give any explicit support to that. The footnote in his essay links to Jim Hoffman's website pointing out how "no plane" is BS, which suggests that Sunstein knows that it was exactly that (intentional disinformation).

    It is similar to how Popular Mechanics used graphics from "questionsquestions.net" (one of the early 9/11 truth websites) to debunk two of the most stupid fake claims for "truth. Now, Popular Mechanics no longer has the graphics on their web version of the famous "9/11 Lies" article but the admission (they know there were fake claims inserted as disinformation) is tacitly in the public domain.

    http://www.oilempire.us/hoax-jokes.html

    In contrast, Griffin is on record stating there isn't 9/11 disinformation and the idea of false claims is not important. Is that a political posture or a sincere error? I doubt there's much new in his "Cognitive Infiltration" book that isn't merely recycled from his last several publications.

    Posted 13 years ago #

Reply

You must log in to post.