I have recently come across a critical piece against my work on Jones.
Unlike a good old fashioned critique. The author chose to distort and misrepresent my work. The same thing happened when John Hankey got in trouble. His weak come backs, literally blamed Jim and I for noticing them. Bailey's comments are along the same lines.
As you all well know. Kooks and cranks choose to distort others arguments in the face of gross and outright humiliation for their own failings. Jim Fetzer is a classic case of this. Bailey, though he says he likes CTKA and Jim DiEugenio clearly does not get the fact that Barr McClellan is deemed a joke by Jim and I. As is Alex Jones. In fact Bailey can't seem to discern that my article is not a one off but endorsed by practically the entire organisation.
I mean how many people are fans of Rollye James and Michelle Malkin yet subscribe to Lisa Pease and the Real History Archives? I mean who on their FB lists Priscilla Johnson's awful 'Marina and Lee' as their favourite book alongside the 'Bible'. Then attacks me with the stunning intellect and research skills of Barr McClellan?
The ever talented George Bailey. Thats who.
Pardon the grammar and the mistakes in my work. I am a crappy self editor. But I think the points are pretty stellar.
The link is on JFK Lancer.