Forum

TruthMove Forum

TruthMove Forum » TruthMove Main Forum

American Behavioral Scientist (journal) covers State Crimes (3 posts)

  1. nornnxx65
    Member

    Link to Sage, the publisher: http://abs.sagepub.com/content/vol53/issue6/

    Someone has apparently posted all 6 articles at megaupload: http://www.megaupload.com/?d=JJ33SNX4

    Abstracts:

    http://abs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/53/6/7... Sense Making Under “Holographic” Conditions: Framing SCAD Research Matthew T. Witt1 University of La Verne, CA, USA, and Alexander Kouzmin2 Southern Cross University, Lismore, New South Wales (NSW), Australia; University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia (SA), Australia The ellipses of due diligence riddling the official account of the 9/11 incidents continue being ignored by scholars of policy and public administration. This article introduces intellectual context for examining the policy heuristic "State Crimes Against Democracy" (SCAD) (deHaven-Smith, 2006) and its usefulness for better understanding patterns of state criminality of which no extant policy analytic model gives adequate account. This article then introduces papers included in this symposium examining the chimerical presence and perfidious legacy of state criminality against democracy. Key Words: state crimes against democracy • empiricism • shock and awe • holographic state American Behavioral Scientist, Vol. 53, No. 6, 783-794 (2010) DOI: 10.1177/0002764209353272

    http://abs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/53/6/7... Beyond Conspiracy Theory: Patterns of High Crime in American Government Lance deHaven-Smith1 Florida State University, Tallahassee, This article explores the conceptual, methodological, and practical implications of research on state crimes against democracy (SCADs). In contrast to conspiracy theories, which speculate about each suspicious event in isolation, the SCAD construct delineates a general category of criminality and calls for crimes that fit this category to be examined comparatively. Using this approach, an analysis of post—World War II SCADs and suspected SCADs highlights a number of commonalities in SCAD targets, timing, and policy consequences. SCADs often appear where presidential politics and foreign policy intersect. SCADs differ from earlier forms of political corruption in that they frequently involve political, military, and/or economic elites at the very highest levels of the social and political order.The article concludes by suggesting statutory and constitutional reforms to improve SCAD prevention and detection. Key Words: state crimes against democracy • conspiracy theory • assassinations • constitutional reform • political corruption • National Security Apparatus • criminogenic American Behavioral Scientist, Vol. 53, No. 6, 795-825 (2010) DOI: 10.1177/0002764209353274

    http://abs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/53/6/8... Negative Information Action: Danger for Democracy Christopher L. Hinson1 This article explores evidence of, and provides insight into, secrecy-related information actions that are sometimes used to circumvent established government policy and law. These information actions may also be used to cover up such circumventions after the fact. To better understand secrecy as a negative information action and its impact on democracy, secrecy-related information actions are described according to methods, information technologies, and knowledge support. Negative information actions are willful and deliberate acts designed to keep government information from those in government and the public entitled to it. Negative information actions subvert the rule of law and the constitutional checks and balances. Negative information actions used by government officials to violate policies and laws during the IranContra Affair are identified, analyzed, and categorized by type. The relative impact of negative information actions on enlightened citizen understanding is demonstrated using a Negative Information Action Model by assigning a location according to type on a continuum of enlightened citizen understanding. Findings are compared with democratic theory and conspiracy doctrine. Key Words: conspiracy doctrine • democratic theory • enlightened citizen understanding • government secrecy • group-danger rationale • information policy • negative information action • SCAD • state crimes against democracy American Behavioral Scientist, Vol. 53, No. 6, 826-847 (2010) DOI: 10.1177/0002764209353276

    http://abs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/53/6/8... In Denial of Democracy: Social Psychological Implications for Public Discourse on State Crimes Against Democracy Post-9/11 Laurie A. Manwell1 University of Guelph, Ontario, Canada, Protecting democracy requires that the general public be educated on how people can be manipulated by government and media into forfeiting their civil liberties and duties. This article reviews research on cognitive constructs that can prevent people from processing information that challenges preexisting assumptions about government, dissent, and public discourse in democratic societies. Terror management theory and system justification theory are used to explain how preexisting beliefs can interfere with people’s examination of evidence for state crimes against democracy (SCADs), specifically in relation to the events of September 11, 2001, and the war on terror in Afghanistan and Iraq. Reform strategies are proposed to motivate citizens toward increased social responsibility in a post-9/11 culture of propagandized fear, imperialism, and war. Key Words: state crimes against democracy • terror management • system justification • government • media American Behavioral Scientist, Vol. 53, No. 6, 848-884 (2010) DOI: 10.1177/0002764209353279

    http://abs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/53/6/8... The USA PATRIOT Acts (et al.): Convergent Legislation and Oligarchic Isomorphism in the “Politics of Fear” and State Crime(s) Against Democracy (SCADs) Kym Thorne1 University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia and Alexander Kouzmin1,2,3 University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia, Southern Cross University, Lismore, Australia, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK The irrelevance of habeas corpus and the abolition of "double jeopardy," secret and protracted outsourcing of detention and torture, and increasing geographic prevalence of surveillance technologies across Anglo-American "democracies" have many citizens concerned about the rapidly convergent, authoritarian behavior of political oligarchs and the actual destruction of sovereignty and democratic values under the onslaught of antiterrorism hubris, propaganda, and fear. This article examines synchronic legislative isomorphism in responses to 9/11 in the United States, the United Kingdom and European Union, and Australia in terms of enacted terrorism legislation and, also, diachronic, oligarchic isomorphism in the manufacture of fear within a convergent world by comparing the "Politics of Fear" being practiced today to Stalinist—Russian and McCarthyist—U.S. abuse of "fear." The immediate future of Anglo-American democratic hubris, threats to civil society, and oligarchic threats to democratic praxis are canvassed. This article also raises the question as to whether The USA PATRIOT Acts of 2001/2006, sanctioned by the U.S. Congress, are examples, themselves, of state crimes against democracy. In the very least, any democratically inclined White House occupant in 2009 would need to commit to repealing these repressive, and counterproductive, acts. Key Words: USA PATRIOT Act • "War on Terror," politics of fear • policy and oligarchic isomorphism • state crimes against democracy American Behavioral Scientist, Vol. 53, No. 6, 885-920 (2010) DOI: 10.1177/0002764209353280

    http://abs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/53/6/9... Pretending Not to See or Hear, Refusing to Signify: The Farce and Tragedy of Geocentric Public Affairs Scholarship Matthew T. Witt1 University of La Verne, CA, USA This article opens with an inventory of how popular culture passion plays are homologous to the stampeding disenfranchisement everywhere of working classes and the emasculation of professional codes of ethics under siege by neoliberal initiatives and gambits. The article then examines a recent example of contemporary,"deconstructive" scholarly analysis and inventory of presidential "Orwellian doublespeak." The preoccupation among contemporary critical scholarship with "discourse analysis" and language gambits is criticized for displacing interrogation of real-event anomalies, as with the porous account given by the 9/11 Commission for what happened that fateful day. The article concludes by explaining how critical scholarship consistently falls short of unmasking Master Signifiers. Key Words: neoliberalism • poststructuralism • racism • discourse analysis • 9/11 • habeas corpus • thermodynamics American Behavioral Scientist, Vol. 53, No. 6, 921-939 (2010) DOI: 10.1177/0002764209353281

    Posted 14 years ago #
  2. nornnxx65
    Member

    my comment cross-posted from truthaction:

    discussion at 911blogger http://www.911blogger.com/node/22774

    I will be very interested to know the reaction of the scientific community is to these papers. I've briefly looked at them all, and skimmed the papers 'In Denial of Democracy' by Manwell and 'Beyond Conspiracy Theory' by deHaven-Smith, which seem to have more focus on 9/11 in particular, and I looked at the sources Manwell and de Haven-Smith used.

    de Haven-Smith paper's says there have been documented State Crimes Against Democracy (SCADs) and that there are patterns and similarities between them from which meaningful conclusions can be drawn, and recommendations made. He makes numerous speculative assertions, some of which he treats as factual in reaching conclusions, others he acknowledges are speculative, including controlled demolition of the WTC, but he doesn't acknowledge competing hypotheses, whether the official version or work done by 9/11 researchers. For example, this statement, "Evidence also indicates that the Pentagon was hit by a missile rather than a passenger plane." (pg 818)

    The above statement references Note 2, which says, "2. A large and growing literature challenges official accounts of the events of 9/11. See, for example, Griffin (2004, 2005), Hufschmid (2002), Paul and Hoffman (2004), and Tarpley (2005). There is also a “9/11 Truth Movement,” which is producing a detailed studies of 9/11 issues and anomalies. For example, see www.911truth.org, www.911scholars.org, and www.911essentials.com." (821)

    So, as evidence of a '9/11 Truth Movement', in addition to 911truth.org, the only other sites he cites are Fetzer's 911scholars.org and a relatively minor site, 911essentials.com, which seems to represent the worst of the 'New World Order conspiracy theorist' stereotype. There's no mention of the Jersey Girls and the other family members who agitated for a full investigation and have gone on record as skeptical of the 9/11 Commission and supporting a new investigation, or of any of the whistleblowers (Rowley, Shaffer, Edmonds, Singh, etc.). Also omitted were many prominent 9/11 researchers, activists and orgs- Hoffman, Jones and Scott's research is cited- but why cite a minor site like 911essentials.com and omit JO911S, STJ911.org, ae911truth.org, 911blogger.com, cooperativeresearch.org, justifcefor911.org, truthaction, etc.?

    Throughout the paper, in addition to numerous credible (but not peer-reviewed) sources, he also cites dubious sources such as Jim Fetzer, Webster Tarpley, Eric Hufschmid, Morgan & Henshall and David Ray Griffin (yes, DRG's support for fake calls, all manner of 757 didn't the Pentagon theories, and citation of the work of racists, holocaust deniers and Wood, Fetzer, Reynolds, CIT and other dubious sources make me consider him a dubious source).

    In the paper, de Haven-Smith gives numerous examples of alleged SCADs, and I agree it's likely they're crimes by people connected to the deep state, but they have not been proven as such by official investigations or court cases, there's no scholarly consensus they're state crimes, and while the alternative explanations may be popular, they're also controversial. If he mentions torture, rendition or warrantless wiretapping as examples of SCADs i missed it- and these are things Bush and Cheney admitted to on national TV and even in these cases, it's disputed whether crimes were committed or whether it was legal, and no one's been held accountable. If he examines in depth why that is the case, i missed it, though he touches on it briefly here and there. Peter Dale Scott has done great research in this area and he cites him. Unfortunately Scott has not published in a journal on this subject (that I know of) though Road to 9/11 was published by a reputable university press.

    Manwell's paper analyzes psychological blocks to considering evidence and explanations that implicate the state in crimes incl. 9/11, and I didn't see red flags/problems like I pointed out in de Haven-Smiths, but it cites de Haven-Smith's recent and other papers, as well as Fetzer (although he's one of many cited to support the same claim).

    As i said, I'll be very interested to see the reaction of the scientific community to these papers.

    Posted 14 years ago #
  3. mark
    Member

    There's not much "truth" at ae911truth. Perhaps one day they might be willing to mention the WTC tower and WTC 7 were observed leaning (by the firemen) before they fell down, but they'd have to admit being wrong about something, which is damaging to egos and calls into question their fundraising to promote crap claims.

    Cooperativeresearch is probably the best place for anyone to start.

    It probably makes more sense to point out why there will never be a real investigation than to suggest for the Nth time that there should be one. Reading about the 1970s House Select Committee on Assassinations should disabuse anyone of the illusion there will ever be a real investigation, and the disgraceful performance of most of the "truth" movement in echoing nonsense claims marketed as truth ensures that even many who privately agree the official story is fishy won't dare go near any critiques.

    Posted 14 years ago #

Reply

You must log in to post.