Forum

TruthMove Forum

TruthMove Forum » TruthMove Main Forum

Anything to this? PENTAGON AIRCRAFT HIJACK IMPOSSIBLE (3 posts)

  1. truthmod
    Administrator

    http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/index.php?showt...

    Newly decoded data provided by an independent researcher and computer programmer from Australia exposes alarming evidence that the reported hijacking aboard American Airlines Flight 77 was impossible to have existed. A data parameter labeled "FLT DECK DOOR", cross checks with previously decoded data obtained by Pilots For 9/11 Truth from the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) through the Freedom Of Information Act.

    On the morning of September 11, 2001, American Airlines Flight 77 departed Dulles International Airport bound for Los Angeles at 8:20 am Eastern Time. According to reports and data, a hijacking took place between 08:50:54 and 08:54:11[1] in which the hijackers allegedly crashed the aircraft into the Pentagon at 09:37:45. Reported by CNN, according to Ted Olson, wife Barbara Olson had called him from the reported flight stating, "...all passengers and flight personnel, including the pilots, were herded to the back of the plane by armed hijackers..."[2]. However, according to Flight Data provided by the NTSB, the Flight Deck Door was never opened in flight. How were the hijackers able to gain access to the cockpit, remove the pilots, and navigate the aircraft to the Pentagon if the Flight Deck Door remained closed?[3]

    Posted 14 years ago #
  2. truthmover
    Administrator

    We are left to wonder who is this "researcher" and where is his evidence?

    Posted 14 years ago #
  3. mark
    Member

    They will never stop flogging this hoax. The "truth" movement was sunk by the media after it bought into the "no plane" nonsense. They will be teaching this one in disinformation courses for as long as the Empire continues to behave this way.

    It's sad that the only "truth" group that admits the plane hit the Pentagon is truthmove.org A mark of respect and integrity for truthmove, but a sad statement about how the word "truth" has been corrupted to promote lies.

    Of course, most of those who still have doubts the plane really hit the Pentagon are sincere, but that good intention doesn't make them correct. Those who continue to create more "muddy waters" on this are probably not acting of the best intentions, although there are probably some psychological and psychiatric explanations for some people. Whatever the motivations, it just further polarizes without creating positive shift, as intended by the authors.

    Posted 14 years ago #

Reply

You must log in to post.