From the About page:
InfoWarsTV.com was founded on the principle of Truth without censorship. Other video websites will censor content they find offensive. We will not. Sites such as YouTube have gone on a Censorship Campaign of late, and are deleting any and all Truth videos, channels, and accounts. We have created this website as a direct response to their blatant attempts to stifle the flow of information.
To ensure our right to maintain the website in this way: we build, run, and host the entire website. There is no middle man for possible censorship. If our ISP makes any attempts to censor the truth, we will simply switch our ISP.
It should go without saying, that we will not hesitate to censor blatantly offensive content that does not benefit the Truth, e.g. pornography or spam.
Really? It should go without saying? A fair amount of the content I see there I consider "blatantly offensive content that does not benefit the Truth." I call it bogus history and bad journalism. A bit of xenophobia and subtle bigotry mixed in. The usual bloviating AJ wing nut crap.
Keep in mind that the content is user submitted. So the site reflects not just AJ but the mindset of his fans. I consider it fairly revealing. I really wonder what the threshold is. Who is moderating and what would they consider unacceptable?