Another article touting consumer or lifestyle choices as the way to save the environment. What's worse than seeing this nonsense in the mainstream media, is the fact that so many environmentalists buy into it. Hybrids, organic food, bicycling, longer-lasting laptop batteries, blah, blah, blah. Lord help us!
http://www.cnn.com/2009/HEALTH/04/20/thin.global.w...
I tell you what, if "reducing your carbon footprint" was really a solution, then why not kill yourself. Along those lines, take out a bunch of people with you. Killing children is even better since they will be around making footprints for a longer time than adults.
Under this logic Stalin was the world's greatest environmentalist.
Does this mean we should not conserve energy? No. It just means we should not think we are helping the planet by doing so. The environmental problems run much deeper than this simplistic analysis, and only massive change on the "production" can have a real impact. Consumption does not drive production. Consumer choices do not determine what gets produced. This is just a myth of market capitalism that allows profiteers (the producers) to rationalize their production decisions. People did not demand cars. The gutting of public transit infrastructure forced people to buy them.
Lose weight because you will be more healthy, but you aren't doing a damn thing for the earth by going on a diet.
Preaching to the choir, but sometimes I just need to get things out...
Emanuel