Now that the world’s credit markets are suffering the equivalent of a cardiac arrest, one can confidently say that the peak in global oil production is behind us. With demand for oil declining (because of global recession), OPEC will want to constrain production. With investment capital disappearing in a deflationary bonfire, oil companies will have difficulty financing new projects (even if they have full governmental go-ahead to drill, baby, drill). Thus even though the peak might have been delayed for another year or five if the credit crunch hadn’t intervened, that time cushion is now effectively gone.
This is not to say that Peak Oil should no longer to be considered to be of importance. In the larger, longer view of things, the energy decline will be the determining factor in the fate of our civilization—not a money or credit crisis.
When the world finally begins to recover from its financial turmoil (and this could take a few years), and oil demand picks back up again, the economy will bump up against oil supply constraints and petroleum prices will skyrocket, undermining the economic recovery.
Even though oil demand will have been constrained in the intervening years, depletion of existing fields will have continued, so that new production projects (when the industry finally gets around to financing them) will have that much more of a decline rate to offset.
We are in the Hirsch Report’s worst-case scenario—only it’s worse.
The only choice remaining for policy makers is whether to shift all of our collective societal efforts toward building new infrastructure for the low-energy future, or to try vainly just to prop up the credit markets, losing what will probably be the last opportunity to salvage industrial economies.
The amount of time left for dithering—if indeed there still is any—can perhaps be measured in only months.
The silver lining is this: Policy makers now are starting to realize that they must do something dramatic. Timid moves are showing themselves woefully insufficient to deal with the scale of the unfolding economic collapse. Thus a change of direction toward a true energy transition is no longer to be ruled out simply because of the boldness and scale of effort required. The single barrier that remains is the decision-makers’ lack of understanding of the real problem confronting them—and us.
TruthMove Forum » TruthMove Main Forum
Heinberg: Say Goodbye to Peak Oil (2 posts)
-
Posted 16 years ago #
-
This may be more jarring to many people than the idea of Peak Oil...
The End of Growth
http://postcarbon.org/end_growth
Several of us who have been watching the world oil production and depletion picture closely for the last few years are now concluding that the world has now seen the highest rate of production ever. Matt Simmons agrees: It’s all downhill from here.
The worldwide financial crisis, and the decline in available energy, mean that we may also have seen the final year of aggregate world economic growth.
This is a breathtaking statement. I found myself uttering it yesterday at a strategy meeting of some environmental and economic justice organizations organized by the International Forum on Globalization; I surprised even myself, and immediately began wondering whether what I had said could possibly by true.
There are obvious objections. Perhaps the wealthy nations could still wring out a few years of growth by increasing global economic inequality. But this is essentially what they did over the past two decades with the strategy of corporate globalization—and that strategy is losing steam because of high transport costs due to Peak Oil.
Posted 16 years ago #
Reply
You must log in to post.