TruthMove Forum

Register or log in:

Username:

Password:

TruthMove Forum » TruthMove Main Forum

Recent Disinfo and Questionable Behavior in 9/11 TM -- There is always more... (4 posts)

1. truthmod
   Administrator

   I was just perusing some stuff on Truth Action and was very unsurprised to see these recent examples:

   Even DBLS, is questioning Alex Jones:
   http://truthaction.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=3923

   Judy Wood 2008 tour:
   http://truthaction.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=3582

   Pilot For 9/11 Truth: "No Planes on 9/11":
   http://truthaction.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=3528

   One Dozen Ways to Spot a Spook At Your Next 9/11 "Movement" Gathering by Cathy Garger (Most likely written by a spook):
   http://truthaction.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=3767

   I feel like it's all a big joke to the Powers That Be--to see us trying to keep track of all the "agents," deceits, and double-crossings. Kind of like the micro details of the JFK assassination; keep people in a certain pen of analysis so they don't break out and do anything real. We all say that these attacks are evidence of our importance and effectiveness, but let's not pat ourselves on the back too hard.

   It's undeniably important to deconstruct lies and try to spread truth and critical thinking, and I and TruthMove have done a lot of micro-oriented work in these areas. But, I get the feeling like we're treading water in many ways--like we'll all still be incredulous and outspoken about the next instance of sabotage, but that we won't unify and overcome all this bullshit with strong and responsible action.

   Sorry for the downer post, but sometimes, that's how it goes...

   Posted 16 years ago #
2. nornnxx65
   Member

   yeah, Cathy Garger posted about Judy Wood at opednews.com- as if her association with Fetzer's org is not enuf to destroy her credibility.

   I think the Powers That Be do think it's a joke to add to the inflation problem by using misappropriated funds to fuel disinfo ops- as they tremble behind their curtain. One of their greatest tricks was convincing the People that we don't make a difference; if they didn't care about public opinion, and weren't scared of the truth, why would they invest so much money, time and people in promoting disinfo, and "manufacturing consent"?

   One of the main things that drove me to doubt the missile/global hawk claims seriously study the evidence for a 757 hitting the Pentagon was the kind of people pushing the "no 757" theory like it's the "key" as Paul Landis says, so I assume it's having the same effect on anyone with a brain.

   My observations of what's happening online and in the world tells me there is a large number of people who know the OCT is a lie, this bothers them, but they haven't decided it was an "inside job" and they figured out yet what to do about it or how to compel real investigations- it's been tough even getting a sort of impeachment hearing, they're not convinced anything can be done, and all the wacky stuff being circulated online makes them leery of being associated with the "9/11 Truth Movement". However, MSM publish stuff all the time that contradicts the OCT, and even "gatekeepers" like Democracy Now!, CounterPunch, etc. publish/broadcast stuff on Sibel Edmonds, the Anthrax, etc.

   I have faith in human nature, and am encouraged by the accelerating evolution in information technologies- I expect it will continue to empower individuals and dilute the power of the so-called "elites", as well as educate people about their activities.

   Posted 16 years ago #
3. truthmod
   Administrator

   New Proof of Video Fakery on 9/11
   by Jim Fetzer
   July 29, 2008
   http://www.opednews.com/articles/New-Proof-of-Vide...

   Madison, WI (OpEdNews) July 30, 2008 – A recent dispute between the prominent 9/11 activist, Kevin Barrett, and me, the founder of Scholars for 9/11 Truth, has led to the presentation of what I take to be five of the strongest, if not the strongest, arguments for video fakery on 9/11. Indeed, having spent 35 years teaching logic, critical thinking and scientific reasoning, I would describe them as "decisive" in establishing the complicity of the media in misleading the American people about the events of that day. It is a sad commentary on the state of freedom of the press that we now have overwhelming evidence that the mass media – television, in particular – was crucial to the deception.

   Posted 16 years ago #
4. christs4sale
   Administrator

   Listened to Alex Jones interview Tarpley. I had not listened to Alex Jones in over a year and it is nearly impossible for me to listen to him. Someone could write a book about everything that comes out of his mouth and the low percentage of what he states as facts actually being facts.

   The radio show was mostly AJ and Tarpley bickering about Obama. The two pretty much agreed on the issue by giving a different approach to the same right-wing analysis. They love focusing on JUST the Ford Foundation.

   The only interesting part of the show for me was when AJ was yelling at Tarpley about his Ron Paul and immigration positions, which are the few instances where Tarpley makes some sense. Of course he did not say a thing about Tarpley's false COINTELPRO accusations at Ready for Mainstream.

   Tarpley made sure to warn us about left-wing, grassroots, "ecological" movements.

   Posted 16 years ago #

Reply

You must log in to post.