Well, I wrote AC a message regarding his post above. I thought I was being fairly reasonable, if somewhat uncompromising on a couple of points. He immediately posted my message and a response to his blog here:
Response to Julian at TruthMove
http://aconstantineblacklist.blogspot.com/2008/05/...
That wasn't so bad and I thought it possibly the end of this. As I said in the message, we have no reason to be attacking AC. No time and no interest.
But then now we have the following:
The TruthMove.Org Controversy (Introduction)
http://aconstantineblacklist.blogspot.com/2008/05/...
TruthMove.org's Connection to the WQ2RX MEDIA CENSORSHIP GROUP
http://aconstantineblacklist.blogspot.com/2008/05/...
As I said in my message to him, TruthMove has no concern about how AC's opinion might impact our organization. That certainly holds true after the onslaught above, as so much of what he said was either inaccurate or laughable. We don't have to respond as he does a fine job making himself look silly. And we've seen this all before. The tactics are familiar at this point.
He tries to dig up information about us, posting our real names, which are entirely public. The information he posted about me is more biographical than embarrassing. He accuses us of being associated with terrorists while providing not one bit of evidence. The WQ2RX thing is simply ridiculous. And he very transparently make several inaccurate statements about our actions. We haven't talked to John in quite some time. He is an infrequent poster to our forum and we wish him well. He's certainly not working for Al Qaeda.
Well, according to the 2008 Declaration the appropriate response would be to critically engage up to the point that it no longer seems productive, and then drop it. I have reached that point. I plan on making no more comments about this, although I think it prudent to let people know what has happened. If you would like to address this issue further please keep in mind that you risk drawing a similar response as those seen above.